02 Mrz 2021

How Rosetta Terminology Mapping Translates to More Efficient Research and Device Integration

By Teresa Soman, John Zaleski and Cathleen Olguin

The Rosetta Stone helped British and French scholars of the early 1800s decipher ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs.i Etched in the stone tablets was translation of the hieroglyphs written in ancient Greek, which helped unlock the meaning of the Egyptian symbols. 

Two-hundred years later, healthcare information management professionals now have a digital version of the stone tablets: Rosetta Terminology Mapping (RTM)HIM professionals are using RTM because medical devices speak their own language, although not as mysterious as hieroglyphsDevices from different manufacturers, or from the same manufacturers built at different times, present vital signs using variable data element identifiers 

To conduct clinical surveillance on a single patient, this lack of standardization is usually not a big deal. However, performing surveillance or research across a large cohort of patients presents a time-consuming and costly normalization process for providers and researchers. 

Data Normalization Crucial for Interoperability 

Data normalization enables an apples-to-apples information comparison, crucial in healthcare due to the exponential growth of data from other providers, devices and technologies. To normalize this information, numerous data standards in healthcare were created, including SNOMED-CT, CPT, LOINC, RxNorm and others.  

These standards help providers communicate effectively and efficiently with each other, but medical device outputs are for the most part still not unified under a similar single terminology standard. For example, consider a non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) identifier. On one type of patient monitor, the identifier is 16; on a different monitor by the same manufacturer, the identifier is 2667. Some hospitals and researchers manually unify those variable identifiers using in-house developed data standards, which can add significant time und effortProprietary data standards also hinder healthcare organizations’ ability to share research data with another party since one standard will need to be translated to another, risking data integrity. 

In addition, disparate data outputs make the integration of new devices with the electronic health record (EHR) more costly and time-consuming. Such integrations may even be delayed or prevented since manual normalization and verification of data from medical devices can easily consume weeks of effortii, prohibitive for some hospitals. 

How Rosetta Terminology Mapping Can Help 

RTM offers an industryrecognized method to normalize these different identifiers under a common standardIntegrating the Healthcare Enterprise (IHE), consortium of healthcare and industry experts focused on improving healthcare information sharing, created RTM with input from around the world. With RTM, IHE aimto harmonize the use of existing nomenclature to facilitate safe and interoperable communication between devices and systems.”iii  

When RTM is native to the device, it helps speed device connectivity to other systems and improves clinician and researcher workflow efficiency. For example, in the NIBP identifier example mentioned above, although different monitors would identify the output using different identifiers, RTM would normalize these varying outputs to a single, consistent code, recognized by all systems. 

Capsule Technologies is actively working with device manufacturers to help incorporate RTM into their technologies so the data outputs produced can be more easily standardized to support clinical surveillance, research, or both. Capsule recently announced that Retia Medical incorporated RTM into its updated Argos Cardiac Monitor using Capsule’s Device Driver Interface (DDI) development strategy, which will streamline the normalization of outputs from the device for end-users 

In the next blog post, we will describe how the other element of Capsule’s DDI development strategy – IHE HL7 integration profiles – is accelerating medical device connectivity and enabling hospitals to more easily capture data for analysis and research. 

To learn more about the vendor-neutral interoperability solutions of the Capsule Medical Device Information Platform, please contact us.


About the authors

Teresa Soman, MBA, PMP is director of product management; John Zaleski, Ph.D., NREMT, CAP, CPHIMS is head of clinical informatics; and Cathleen Olguin, MBA, BSN, RN, CNOR is senior clinical solutions executive at Capsule Technologies

i
The British Museum. “Everything you ever wanted to know about the Rosetta Stone.” Blog. Accessed January 26, 2021. https://blog.britishmuseum.org/everything-you-ever-wanted-to-know-about-the-rosetta-stone/
ii
Zaleski, John R., Ph.D., “Medical Device Interoperability and Data Integration to Clinical Information Systems: Medical Device Data Alignment.” Biomed Instrum Technol (2012). https://meridian.allenpress.com/bit/article/46/s2/65/142359/Medical-Device-Interoperability-and-Data. Accessed January 26, 2021.
iii
Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise. “PCD Profile Rosetta Terminology Mapping Overview.” Accessed January 25, 2021. https://wiki.ihe.net/index.php/PCD_Profile_Rosetta_Terminology_Mapping_Overview

Download this brochure to find out more about Capsule device integration and the Medical Device Information Platform

HERUNTERLADEN